EVE Search - Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 9 post(s)
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.22 17:28:00 - [1] What really is the problem with carriers and motherships CCP ? The fact that they can fry a battleship ? Considering the ISK and SP investment involved in getting into one AND the risk involved taking them into direct PvP engagements, I think that it is already balanced. All you have to do is remove the super caps invulnerability to being warp scrambled and no one (in their right mind) will take them anywhere without the required support. That would also help towards solving the low sec gankers in their MoMs. Get your heads out of the sand, do you know how much the player base has invested in getting the skills (ISK), them trained (TIME) and buying one (ISK+TIME) ? Limiting the main combat ability of these ships is not the answer. --
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.22 17:35:00 - [2] Originally by: Corden I would even bet, that people wont train for your capital ships anymore. I would sign this but I already have invested the time and ISK. I guess I can sign it for those that haven't taken the plunge yet. Just wait until people have invested loads of training in black ops and then they get nerfed too. CCP, are you out to annoy your player base ? (Just thought about the comment about not haven been given the nerf bat yet, I think that you invented the T5 version and don't need anyone elses) --
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.22 18:39:00 - [3] Originally by: Kwint Sommer Originally by: Hermaphrodiety Thanks to Tieger for this brilliant sig. I'm stealing this sig, I know it's bad form but it's for a good cause. If it's really an issue drop me an eve-mail. Me too, excellent sig. --
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:19:00 - [4] Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 23/10/2007 22:22:26 The idea is still BOLLOXS and will remain BOLLOXS, even if you simply take SPs, ISK and time invested into account, it's still BOLLOXS. After that investment, I think that you SHOULD be able to BBQ a battleship. What CCP got wrong, was making sure that they can't get scrambled in EMPIRE, no bubbles, no 'dictors, no way. Remove this ability (i.e. not being able to be warp scrambled without a bubble) otherwise it remains BOLLOXS. So, Zulu, after so many pages, did you get the position of the players, the idea is BOLLOXS. --
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:29:00 - [5] Originally by: spidy 105 Originally by: Jaabaa Prime Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 23/10/2007 22:19:31 The idea is still BOLLOXS and will remain BOLLOXS, even if you simple take SPs, ISK and time invested into account, it's still BOLLOXS. After that investment, I think that you SHOULD be able to BBQ a battleship. What CCP got wrong, was making sure that they can't get scrambled in EMPIRE, no bubbles, no 'dictors, no way. Remove this ability (i.e. not being able to be warp scrambled without a bubble) remains BOLLOXS. So, Zulu, after so many pages, did you get the position of the players, the idea is BOLLOXS. If you're referring to carriers, they can be stopped with a simple tech 1 warp disruptor, but if its motherships i agree with you This can only be directed against low sec MS owners, because no sane carrier pilot will engage in 0.0 without support. Be real, drone lag ? you can still assign them all to pilots in the same grid, this can only be directed towards the newbs that fly them in low sec being invul to a scram. Which really ****es off all the people on these pages that use their carriers in 0.0 in alliance warfare (read blobs/lag fest/CTD). --
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:50:00 - [6] 100 pages still doesn't say that this is wrong ? Did someone deliver some "good stuff" to the devs and they didn't notice the uproar yet ? --
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:54:00 - [7] Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 23/10/2007 22:54:16 Originally by: Gridwalker Originally by: Grimster Finding the all but total lack of a real response to this outstanding. Wondering what the No1 topic of FanFest is gonna be? Ambulation? ;-) -Grid LOL Grid, that is going to be topic number 1, how could we forget. --

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.